On February 9, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 113, enacting several taxpayer-friendly updates for 2022. Specifically, the state estimates $6.1 billion in savings to taxpayers due to increases in the amount of potential Pass-through Entity Elective Tax (PEET) credits and who can claim those credits; the removal of the suspension on NOLs and R&D credits for taxpayers for the 2022 tax year; retroactive conformity to certain federal relief provisions for tax year 2020; and increased film industry tax credits.
Specifically, under SB 113:
Businesses will be able to fully utilize NOLs and R&D credits for the tax year 2022.
There will be expanded eligibility and application of California’s Pass-through Entity Elective Tax (PEET) through several new provisions:
Qualified net income now includes guaranteed payments.
MGO Insight: This will significantly increase the value of the PEET for owners/operators of pass-through service providers.
Individual taxpayers can apply the PEET state credit against tentative minimum tax.
MGO Insight: By removing the 7% tentative minimum tax threshold, more of the PEET credit can be used in a given year, resulting in less carryovers and less concerns about electing into the PEET in consecutive years.
Passthrough entities with owners that are partnerships are now eligible to make the PEET election.
SMLLCs that are pass-through entity owners can now claim the PEET credit.
MGO Insight: By removing the limitation on partnership owners and SMLLCs, more pass-through businesses will be able to benefit from the PEET including lower-tier partnerships.
New credit usage ordering rules increase the benefit for taxpayers that claim the Other State Tax (OST) Credit.
MGO Insight: OST credits are now specifically utilized before PEET credits, which should significantly reduce credit leakage for taxpayers with income in multiple states. (Prior to this, there was ambiguity on the ordering of credits and concerns that certain OST credits would not be able to be fully utilized.)
The law also includes some beneficial retroactive relief:
California will fully conform to the federal treatment of Restaurant Revitalization grants, retroactive to the 2020 tax year, and partially conform to the federal exclusion of Shuttered Venue Operator grants, retroactive to the 2020 tax year.
Producers of qualified motion pictures benefit from increased flexibility to use sales & use tax credits against income taxes and sales & use tax; the prohibition period for this benefit has been shortened to only the 2020 and 2021 tax years. In addition, certain producers will have the ability to obtain an immediate refund for the 2021 tax year on sales & use tax in excess of the $5 million cap.
In addition to the tax benefits signed into law by SB 113, Gov. Newsom also signed SB 114, which creates COVID leave rules for 2022 that should benefit California workers:
Employers with more than 25 employees will be required to provide up to 80 hours of COVID-19-related paid supplemental sick and family leave for the period January 1, 2022 (retroactive) through September 30, 2022. No additional tax benefits or credits have been provided in relation to this additional requirement.
With higher-than-anticipated tax revenues during the COVID pandemic, California improved the availability of various tax benefits, resulting in significant potential tax savings for California taxpayers in 2022 and later tax years that should help boost the state’s economic recovery.
The first advance payments under the temporarily expanded child tax credit (CTC) will begin to arrive for nearly 39 million households in mid-July 2021 — unless, that is, they opt out. Most eligible families won’t need to do anything to receive the payments, but you need to understand the implications and why advance payments might not make sense for your household even if you qualify for them.
Understanding the CTC, then and now
The CTC was established in 1997. Unlike a deduction, which reduces taxable income, a credit reduces the amount of taxes you owe on a dollar-for-dollar basis. While some credits are limited by the amount of your tax liability, others, like the CTC, are refundable, which means that even taxpayers with no federal tax liability can benefit. Historically, the CTC has been only partially refundable in that the refundable amount was limited to $1,400.
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) significantly expands the credit, albeit only for 2021. Specifically, the ARPA boosts the CTC from $2,000 to $3,000 per child ages six through 17, with credits of $3,600 for each child under age six. Plus, the CTC is now fully refundable. It also affords taxpayers the opportunity to take advantage of half of the benefit in 2021, rather than waiting until tax time in 2022.
Note, however, that there are limits to eligibility. The $2,000 credit is subject to a phaseout when income exceeds $400,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for other filers, and this continues under the ARPA — for the first $2,000. A separate phaseout applies for the increased amount: $75,000 for single filers, $112,500 for heads of household and $150,000 for joint filers.
Receiving advance payments
The ARPA directed the U.S. Treasury Department to begin making monthly payments of half of the credit in July 2021, with the remaining half to be claimed in 2022 on 2021 tax returns. For example, a household that’s eligible for a $3,600 CTC will receive $1,800 ($300 in six monthly payments) in 2021 and would claim the balance of $1,800 on the 2021 return. The payments will be made on the 15th of each month through December 2021, except for August, when they’ll be paid on August 13.
To qualify for advance payments, you (and your spouse, if filing jointly) must have:
Filed a 2019 or 2020 tax return that claims the CTC or provided the IRS with information in 2020 to claim a stimulus payment,
A main home in the United States for more than half of the year or file a joint return with a spouse who has a U.S. home for more than half of the year,
A qualifying child who’s under age 18 at the end of 2021 and who has a valid Social Security number, and
Earned less than the applicable income limit.
If the IRS has your bank information, you’ll receive the payments as direct deposits.
Because the IRS will base the payments on your 2020 tax return (or, if not yet available, your 2019 return), it’s possible that you could receive excess payments over the amount you actually qualify for in 2021. In that case — unlike excess stimulus payments — you’ll be required to repay the excess. The IRS will either deduct the amount from your 2021 refund or add it to the amount you owe.
Opting out
The IRS will automatically enroll taxpayers for advance payments, but it’s also providing an online portal at irs.gov where taxpayers can opt out. You might consider opting out if, for example, you were near the income limits in 2019 or 2020, expect to earn more in 2021, and want to avoid excess payments. Be aware that couples filing jointly must both opt out, otherwise the spouse who doesn’t will receive half of the joint payment.
It’s not only a change in expected income that could lead to excess payments; it’s also a change in the number of dependents. For example, divorced couples who share joint custody may alternate the years in which they claim their children as dependents for CTC purposes. If 2021 is your former spouse’s year, consider opting out (your former spouse won’t receive the advance payments based on his or her 2020 tax return but, if eligible, can claim the credit on the 2021 return). Parents of children who will turn age 18 in 2021 also should consider opting out. The deadline to opt out of the first payment was June 28, 2021, but you can still opt out for future payments.
Estimating, and reducing, 2021 income
When deciding whether to opt out, you can estimate your 2021 income using multiple methods. You could simply look at your modified adjusted gross income on your most recent tax return. You also could project your income for the year and reduce it by the standard deduction (for 2021, it’s $12,550 for individual taxpayers and $25,100 for married couples filing jointly).
If you estimate that your income will be near the eligibility threshold but want to receive the advance payments, you can take measures to reduce your income before year end. You might, for example, increase your 401(k) plan contributions (the contribution limit for 2021 is $19,500). Taxpayers with high deductible health plans and health savings accounts (HSAs) can similarly reduce their income with contributions. The HSA contribution limits for 2021 are $3,600 for individual health plans and $7,200 for family health plans.
Beyond 2021
The expanded CTC is available only for 2021 as of now. President Biden has indicated that he’d like to extend it through at least 2025, and some Democratic lawmakers hope to make it permanent. But it’ll be challenging to pass a bill to make either of these proposals happen. We’ll keep you informed about any developments that could affect your tax planning.
Homeowners and businesses across the country have experienced weather-related disasters in recent months. From hurricanes, tornadoes and other severe storms to the wildfires again raging in the West, natural disasters have led to significant losses for a wide swath of taxpayers. If you’re among them, you may qualify for a federal income tax deduction, as well as other relief from the IRS.
Eligibility for the casualty loss deduction
Casualty losses can result from the damage, destruction or loss of property due to any sudden, unexpected or unusual event. Examples include floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Normal wear and tear or progressive deterioration of property doesn’t constitute a deductible casualty loss. For example, drought generally doesn’t qualify.
The availability of the tax deduction for casualty losses varies depending on whether the losses relate to personal-use or business-use items. Generally, you can deduct casualty losses related to your home, household items and personal vehicles if they’re caused by a federally declared disaster — meaning a disaster that occurred in an area that the U.S. president declares eligible for federal assistance. Casualty losses related to business or income-producing property (for example, rental property) can be deducted regardless of whether they occur in a federally declared disaster area.
Casualty losses are deductible in the year of the loss, usually the year of the casualty event. If your loss stemmed from a federally declared disaster, you can opt to treat it as having occurred in the previous year. You may receive your refund more quickly if you amend the previous year’s return than if you wait until you file your return for the casualty year.
The role of reimbursements
If your casualty loss is covered by insurance, you must reduce the loss by the amount of any reimbursement or expected reimbursement. (You also must reduce the loss by any salvage value). Reimbursement also could lead to capital gains tax liability.
When the amount you receive from insurance or other reimbursements (less any expense you incurred to obtain reimbursement, such as the cost of an appraisal) exceeds the cost or adjusted basis of the property, you have a capital gain. You’ll need to include that gain as income unless you’re eligible to postpone reporting the gain.
You may be able to postpone the reporting obligation if you purchase property that’s similar in service or use to the destroyed property within the specified replacement period. You also can postpone if you buy a controlling interest (at least 80%) in a corporation owning similar property or if you spend the reimbursement to restore the property.
Alternatively, you can offset casualty gains with casualty losses not attributable to a federally declared disaster. This is the only way you can deduct personal-use property casualty losses incurred in areas not declared disaster areas.
The loss amount vs. the deduction
For personal-use property, or business-use or income-producing property that isn’t completely destroyed, your casualty loss is the lesser of: • The adjusted basis of the property immediately before the loss (generally, your original cost, plus improvements and less depreciation), or • The drop in fair market value (FMV) of the property as a result of the casualty (that is, the difference between the FMV immediately before and immediately after the casualty).
For business-use or income-producing property that’s completely destroyed, the amount of the loss is the adjusted basis less any salvage value and reimbursements.
If a single casualty involves more than one piece of property, you must figure the loss on each separately. You then combine these losses to determine the casualty loss.
An exception applies to personal-use real property, such as a home. The entire property (including improvements such as landscaping) is treated as one item. The loss is the smaller of the decline in FMV of the entire property and the entire property’s adjusted basis.
Other limits may apply to the amount of the loss you may deduct, too. For personal-use property, you must reduce each casualty loss by $100 (after you’ve subtracted any salvage value and reimbursement).
If you suffer more than one casualty loss during the tax year, you must reduce each loss by $100 and report each on a separate IRS form. If two or more taxpayers have losses from the same casualty, the $100 rule applies separately to each taxpayer.
But that’s not all. For personal-use property, you also must reduce your total casualty losses by 10% of your adjusted gross income, after you’ve applied the $100 rule. As a result, smaller personal-use casualty losses often provide little or no tax benefit.
The requisite records
Documentation is critical to claim a casualty loss deduction. You’ll need to be able to show: • That you were the owner of the property or, if you leased it, that you were contractually liable to the owner for the damage, • The type of casualty and when it occurred, • That the loss was a direct result of the casualty, and • Whether a claim for reimbursement with a reasonable expectation of recovery exists.
You also must be able to establish your adjusted basis, reimbursements and, for personal-use property, pre- and post-casualty FMVs.
Additional relief
The IRS has granted tax relief this year to victims of numerous natural disasters, including “affected taxpayers” in Alabama, California, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas. The relief typically extends filing and other deadlines. (For detailed information for your state visit: https://bit.ly/3nzF2ui.)
Note that you can be an affected taxpayer even if you don’t live in a federally declared disaster area. You’re considered affected if records you need to meet a filing or payment deadline postponed during the applicable relief period are located in a covered disaster area. For example, if you don’t live in a disaster area, but your tax preparer does and is unable to pay or file on your behalf, you likely qualify for filing and payment relief.
A team effort
If you’ve incurred casualty losses this year, tax relief could mitigate some of the financial pain. We can help you maximize your tax benefits and ensure compliance with any extensions.
The IRS recently issued its 2022 cost-of-living adjustments for more than 60 tax provisions. With inflation up significantly this year, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many amounts increased considerably over 2021 amounts. As you implement 2021 year-end tax planning strategies, be sure to take these 2022 adjustments into account.
Also, keep in mind that, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), annual inflation adjustments are calculated using the chained consumer price index (also known as C-CPI-U). This increases tax bracket thresholds, the standard deduction, certain exemptions and other figures at a slower rate than was the case with the consumer price index previously used, potentially pushing taxpayers into higher tax brackets and making various breaks worth less over time. The TCJA adopts the C-CPI-U on a permanent basis.
Individual income taxes
Tax-bracket thresholds increase for each filing status but, because they’re based on percentages, they increase more significantly for the higher brackets. For example, the top of the 10% bracket increases by $325 to $650, depending on filing status, but the top of the 35% bracket increases by $16,300 to $19,550, again depending on filing status.
The TCJA suspended personal exemptions through 2025. However, it nearly doubled the standard deduction, indexed annually for inflation through 2025. For 2022, the standard deduction is $25,900 (married couples filing jointly), $19,400 (heads of households), and $12,950 (singles and married couples filing separately). After 2025, standard deduction amounts are scheduled to drop back to the amounts under pre-TCJA law unless Congress extends the current rules or revises them.
Changes to the standard deduction could help some taxpayers make up for the loss of personal exemptions. But it might not help taxpayers who typically used to itemize deductions.
Alternative minimum tax
The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is a separate tax system that limits some deductions, doesn’t permit others and treats certain income items differently. If your AMT liability is greater than your regular tax liability, you must pay the AMT.
Like the regular tax brackets, the AMT brackets are annually indexed for inflation. For 2022, the threshold for the 28% bracket increased by $6,200 for all filing statuses except married filing separately, which increased by half that amount.
The AMT exemptions and exemption phaseouts are also indexed. The exemption amounts for 2022 are $75,900 for singles and heads of households and $118,100 for joint filers, increasing by $2,300 and $3,500, respectively, over 2021 amounts. The inflation-adjusted phaseout ranges for 2022 are $539,900–$843,500 (singles and heads of households) and $1,079,800–$1,552,200 (joint filers). Amounts for separate filers are half of those for joint filers.
Education and child-related breaks
The maximum benefits of certain education and child-related breaks generally remain the same for 2022. But most of these breaks are limited based on a taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income (MAGI). Taxpayers whose MAGIs are within an applicable phaseout range are eligible for a partial break — and breaks are eliminated for those whose MAGIs exceed the top of the range.
The MAGI phaseout ranges generally remain the same or increase modestly for 2022, depending on the break. For example:
The American Opportunity credit. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2020, the MAGI amount used by joint filers to determine the reduction in the American Opportunity credit isn’t adjusted for inflation. The credit is phased out for taxpayers with MAGI in excess of $80,000 ($160,000 for joint returns). The maximum credit per eligible student is $2,500.
The Lifetime Learning credit. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2020, the MAGI amount used by joint filers to determine the reduction in the Lifetime Learning credit isn’t adjusted for inflation. The credit is phased out for taxpayers with MAGI in excess of $80,000 ($160,000 for joint returns). The maximum credit is $2,000 per tax return.
The adoption credit. The phaseout ranges for eligible taxpayers adopting a child will also increase for 2022 — by $6,750 to $223,410–$263,410 for joint, head-of-household and single filers. The maximum credit increases by $450, to $14,890 for 2022.
(Note: Married couples filing separately generally aren’t eligible for these credits.)
These are only some of the education and child-related breaks that may benefit you. Keep in mind that, if your MAGI is too high for you to qualify for a break for your child’s education, your child might be eligible to claim one on his or her tax return.
Gift and estate taxes
The unified gift and estate tax exemption and the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption are both adjusted annually for inflation. For 2022, the amount is $12.060 million (up from $11.70 million for 2021).
The annual gift tax exclusion increases by $1,000 to $16,000 for 2022.
Retirement plans
Not all of the retirement-plan-related limits increase for 2022. Thus, depending on the type of plan you have, you may have limited opportunities to increase your retirement savings if you’ve already been contributing the maximum amount allowed.
Your MAGI may reduce or even eliminate your ability to take advantage of IRAs. Fortunately, IRA-related MAGI phaseout range limits all will increase for 2022:
Traditional IRAs. MAGI phaseout ranges apply to the deductibility of contributions if a taxpayer (or his or her spouse) participates in an employer-sponsored retirement plan:
For married taxpayers filing jointly, the phaseout range is specific to each spouse based on whether he or she is a participant in an employer-sponsored plan:
For a spouse who participates, the 2022 phaseout range limits increase by $4,000, to $109,000–$129,000.
For a spouse who doesn’t participate, the 2022 phaseout range limits increase by $6,000, to $204,000–$214,000.
For single and head-of-household taxpayers participating in an employer-sponsored plan, the 2022 phaseout range limits increase by $2,000, to $68,000–$78,000.
Taxpayers with MAGIs in the applicable range can deduct a partial contribution; those with MAGIs exceeding the applicable range can’t deduct any IRA contribution.
But a taxpayer whose deduction is reduced or eliminated can make nondeductible traditional IRA contributions. The $6,000 contribution limit (plus $1,000 catch-up if applicable and reduced by any Roth IRA contributions) still applies. Nondeductible traditional IRA contributions may be beneficial if your MAGI is also too high for you to contribute (or fully contribute) to a Roth IRA.
Roth IRAs. Whether you participate in an employer-sponsored plan doesn’t affect your ability to contribute to a Roth IRA, but MAGI limits may reduce or eliminate your ability to contribute:
For married taxpayers filing jointly, the 2022 phaseout range limits increase by $6,000, to $204,000–$214,000.
For single and head-of-household taxpayers, the 2022 phaseout range limits increase by $4,000, to $129,000–$144,000.
You can make a partial contribution if your MAGI falls within the applicable range, but no contribution if it exceeds the top of the range.
(Note: Married taxpayers filing separately are subject to much lower phaseout ranges for both traditional and Roth IRAs.)
2022 cost-of-living adjustments and tax planning
With many of the 2022 cost-of-living adjustment amounts trending higher, you have an opportunity to realize some tax relief next year. In addition, with certain retirement-plan-related limits also increasing, you have the chance to boost your retirement savings. If you have questions on the best tax-saving strategies to implement based on the 2022 numbers, please give us a call. We’d be happy to help.
As if another year of the COVID-19 pandemic wasn’t enough to produce an unusual landscape for year-end tax planning, Congress continues to negotiate the budget reconciliation bill. The proposed Build Back Better Act (BBBA) is certain to include some significant tax provisions, but much uncertainty remains about their impact. While we wait to see which tax provisions are ultimately included in the BBBA, here are some year-end tax planning strategies to consider to reduce your 2021 tax liability.
Accelerate and defer with care
One of the most reliable year-end tactics for reducing taxes has long been to accelerate your deductible expenses and defer your income. For example, self-employed individuals who use cash-basis accounting can delay invoices until late December and move up the planned purchase of equipment or the payment of estimated state income taxes from early next year to this year.
This technique has always carried the caveat that you generally shouldn’t pursue it if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket the following year. Potential provisions in the BBBA also may make it advisable for certain taxpayers to reverse the strategy for 2021 — that is, accelerate income and defer deductible expenses.
The current version of the BBBA would impose a new “surtax” of 5% on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) that exceeds $10 million, with an additional 3% on income of more than $25 million. As a result, the highest earners could pay a 45% federal marginal income tax on wages and business income (the current 37% income tax rate plus 8%). It could be even higher when combined with the net investment income tax, which might be expanded to include active business income for pass-through entities.
In addition, there’s a proposal to temporarily increase the $10,000 cap on the state and local tax deduction to $80,000. Individuals in high-tax states should consider whether there may be an advantage to accelerating a 2022 property or estimated state income tax payment into 2021, or whether the deduction might be more valuable next year, particularly if they’ll face a higher effective tax rate.
Leverage your losses
Taxpayers with substantial capital gains in 2021 could benefit from “harvesting” their losses before year-end. Capital losses can be used to offset capital gains, and up to $3,000 ($1,500 for married persons filing separately) of excess losses (those that exceed the amount of gains for the year) can be applied against ordinary income. Any remaining losses can be carried forward indefinitely.
Beware, however, of the wash-sale rule. Generally, the rule prohibits the deduction of a loss if you acquire “substantially identical” investments within 30 days, before or after, of the date of the sale.
Taxpayers who itemize their deductions could compound their tax benefits by donating the proceeds from the sale of a depreciated investment to a charity. They can both offset realized gains and claim a charitable contribution deduction for the donation.
Satisfy your charitable inclinations
For 2021, charitable contributions can reduce taxes for both itemizers and non-itemizers. Taxpayers who take the standard deduction can claim an above-the-line deduction of $300 ($600 for married couples filing jointly) for cash contributions to qualified charitable organizations.
The adjusted gross income limit for cash donations is 100% for 2021; it’s scheduled to return to 60% for 2022. That means you could offset all of your taxable income with charitable contributions this year. (Donations to donor advised funds and private foundations don’t qualify, though.)
Taxpayers who don’t generally itemize can benefit by “bunching” their charitable contributions. In other words, delaying or accelerating contributions into a tax year to exceed the standard deduction and claim itemized deductions. For example, if you usually make your donations at the end of the year, you could bunch donations in alternative years — say, donate in January and December of 2022 and January and December of 2024.
Retired taxpayers who are age 70½ and older can reduce their taxable income by making qualified charitable contributions of up to $100,000 from their non-Roth IRAs. Retired or not, individuals age 72 and older can use such contributions to satisfy their annual required minimum distributions (RMDs). Note that RMDs were suspended for 2020 but are effective for 2021.
So long as the assets would be considered long-term if they were sold, donations of appreciated assets offer a double-barreled tax benefit. You avoid the capital gains tax on the appreciation and can deduct the asset’s fair market value as of the date of the gift.
Convert traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs
As in 2020, when many taxpayers saw lower than typical income, 2021 could be a smart time to convert funds in traditional pre-tax IRAs to an after-tax Roth IRA. Roth IRAs have no RMDs, and distributions are tax-free.
You’ll have to pay income tax on the converted funds, but it’s better to do so while subject to lower tax rates. Similarly, if you convert securities that have dropped in value, your tax may well be lower now than down the road — and any subsequent appreciation while in the Roth IRA will be tax-free.
It’s worth noting that President Biden had proposed including a provision in the BBBA that would limit the ability of wealthy individuals to engage in Roth conversions. There was a lot of back-and-forth with respect to these provisions, and the latest version of the House bill includes certain restrictions. Whether these provisions will make it past any Senate amendments remains to be seen, but the proposal could be a harbinger of future proposed restrictions.
Proceed with caution
The strategies outlined above always come with pros and cons, but perhaps never more so than now, when potentially significant tax legislation that would take effect next year is under negotiation. We can help you chart the best course in light of any developments.
On July 16, 2021, California joined a growing number of states that have enacted workarounds to the $10,000 limitation on the federal deduction for state and local taxes (SALT). California’s approach is to permit eligible pass-through entities to annually elect to pay a special tax (at a 9.3% flat rate) on the income allocable to certain participating owners of those entities (the “PTE Tax”) and then to claim the related tax payments as a business deduction. The result is that participating owners receive a potentially larger deduction for state taxes on their federal tax returns and a tax credit equal to their share of PTE Tax paid on their California state tax returns.
California’s workaround is in effect for the 2021 tax year and will continue to be available through the 2025 tax year (although it could expire earlier if the federal $10,000 limitation is repealed by Congress prior to its current sunset date of January 1, 2026).
The state tax credit, which is nonrefundable, can be carried over for five years. Nonresidents and part-year residents do not have to prorate the credit to account for their non-California income.
How to elect
California’s workaround is available for partnerships (including those structured as LLCs) and S corporations that only have individuals, trusts, estates, and/or corporations as owners. Publicly traded partnerships, partnerships owned by other partnerships, members of a combined reporting group, and disregarded entities do not qualify. (Disregarded Single-Member LLCs are not eligible to make the election, but will not make the entity ineligible if they are an owner of an otherwise eligible PTE).
Not all the owners of the pass-through entity need to consent to the election. Those that do not consent are not included in the calculation of the PTE Tax. To take advantage of the workaround, the pass-through entity needs to make the election annually on its state tax return. In addition, payments towards the PTE Tax need to be made by specified due dates.
• For the 2021 tax year, 100% of the PTE Tax needs to be paid by the due date for the pass-through entity’s state tax return without extensions – March 15, 2022.
• In later years, the PTE tax needs to be paid in two installments: the first installment is due by June 15 of the tax year for which the election is being made, and the second installment is due by the due date for the pass-through entity’s state tax return for that tax year without extensions (i.e., the following March 15). The minimum amount for the first installment is $1,000.
What to consider
The biggest benefit to the owners of a pass-through entity is the ability to claim a federal tax deduction for their share of the pass-through entity’s state income tax paid to California, but there is another potential benefit. In future years (starting with the 2022 tax year) PTE Tax payments may create some “float” for the owners in terms of the timing and amount of their individual estimated tax payments:
Individuals in California need to pay 70% of their estimated tax liability through quarterly payments on April 15 and June 15, while the PTE Tax only requires that one installment of 50% of the total tax be paid in by June 15.
Individuals in California need to pay the remaining 30% of their estimated tax liability by January 15 of the following year (i.e., the 4th quarter payment), while the PTE Tax only requires the remaining 50% be paid in by March 15.
However, despite these benefits, other factors should be considered before making the election:
If the pass-through entity provides most of the income for an owner and that owner’s top California tax rate is less than or equal to 9.3%, the state tax credit cannot be used in full before it expires. On the other hand, since the election is made annually, you could avoid accruing too much carryover by opting not to elect in a following year.
It’s unclear how California’s workaround will interact with pass-through entity tax regimes enacted by other states, especially their associated state tax credits. California provides credits against most other states’ taxes, but guidance has not been provided to indicate that it will afford the same treatment to other state PTE Taxes paid. Multi-state operators may not be able to reduce California taxable income by the amounts of other states’ similar taxes.
The 9.3% flat rate may not be sufficient to cover the full tax liability for higher income owners.
The PTE tax credit does not reduce the amount of tax due below California’s Tentative Minimum Tax (TMT), and thus may not be as beneficial for taxpayers subject to the TMT.
There are considerations pertaining to cash management, since the pass-through entity would be paying the PTE Tax, not the owners.
Non-resident withholding (7% for individuals) is not offset by the withholding requirements for the PTE Election. Non-resident taxpayers making the election would therefore be required to pay in tax at 16.3% among the quarterly and bi-annual installments, then claim a refund up to the amount of the 7% withholding. But because the 9.3% PTE Tax is non-refundable, to the extent that withholding exceeds tax due, it would need to be claimed in a later year.
How we can help
This PTE Election is a little complicated, but it is worth the effort to explore. MGO’s state and local tax professionals can advise you on the numerous pass-through entity tax regimes being passed by states to counter the federal limitation on deducting state taxes. Our cumulative experience as SALT specialists can help you determine if you are able to benefit from pass-through entity taxes and how to appropriately use them. Reach out to our team of experienced practitioners for your state and local tax needs.
During the pandemic, telemedicine services provided important solutions to a system in crisis. They helped ease the burden on health care facilities and staff and offered individuals the care they needed. While in-person visits may have been a preference in the past, COVID-19 demonstrated the convenience and effectiveness of telemedicine for both patients and care providers. Though the health crisis has abated in many areas of the United States, caring for patients remotely through telemedicine will continue to provide important health resources, and valuable opportunities for software developers.
Tax incentives for telemedicine tools
Health care professionals are incorporating tablets, chat capabilities, and other mobile solutions to diagnose more patients in a shorter amount of time and across geographical boundaries. This demand for innovation presents opportunities for software companies, and the development of these technologies is being encouraged by Federal and state Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credits.
About the R&D tax credit
Enacted in 1981, the Federal R&D Tax Credit allows a credit of up to 14 percent of eligible spending for new and improved software products.
To qualify as an R&D activity, one must meet each of the following criteria:
• Technological in nature. Activities must be based on hard science. • Qualified purpose. Activities must be intended to develop a new or improved product or process. • Technological uncertainty. Activities must be aimed at eliminating uncertainty with respect to the development of a product or process. • Process of experimentation. Activities must involve a systemic or iterative approach of evaluating different alternatives to eliminate ambiguity.
Software companies developing platforms to enable and improve remote health care may be able to take advantage of the R&D Tax Credit as a dollar-for-dollar tax saving for the work that they are already doing.
Software activities that may qualify for a tax credit If your company is investing in developing telemedicine platforms, you may be able a claim an R&D Tax Credit. Though each situation is unique, development activities for the following products may qualify:
Tools that allow physicians to view medical images and other data on mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets, and other electronic devices
Application programming interfaces and capabilities to transfer information electronically and view electronic medical files
Cloud-based platforms to enable health care providers to directly engage patients in an easy-to-use virtual care environment that is HIPAA compliant
Platforms with the capabilities of linking physicians and pharmacies to allow physicians to submit a prescription electronically
Wearable devices with sensors to provide continuous monitoring of patients and automated treatment for health conditions
Virtual therapy platforms for online counseling
Medical data cloud storage solutions and data security
How we can help
The pandemic put our current telemedicine capabilities to the test, and patients gave these innovations a passing grade. But we have yet to experience the true power of telemedicine. As the innovation continues and popularity grows, we can be certain of even more widespread acceptance of telemedicine. And as the need continues to increase, it appears that the various tax credits for research and development will be available to help support the work of those who develop technology in the health care sector.
MGO professionals bring over 25 years of R&D Tax Credit experience to help you identify, analyze, file, and defend your claim. We provide a no-cost eligibility analysis to determine if these tax incentives are appropriate to your situation.
About the author
Michael Silvio is a partner at MGO. He has more than 25 years of experience in public accounting and tax and has served a variety of public and private businesses in the manufacturing, distribution, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology sectors.
Often viewed as a “public company problem,” private organizations may want to consider implementing internal controls similar to Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404 requirements. The inherent benefits of a strong control environment may be of significant value to a private company by providing: enhanced accountability throughout the organization, reduced risk of fraud, improved processes and financial reporting, and more effective inclusion of the Board of Directors.
Private organizations, while not always smaller, often have limited resources in specialty areas, including accounting for income tax. This resource constraint —the work being done outside the core accounting team — combined with the complexity of the issues, means private companies are ideal candidates for, and can achieve significant benefit from, internal controls enhancements. Thinking beyond the present, the following are five reasons private companies may want to adopt public-company-level controls:
1. Future Initial Public Offering (IPO) – Walk before you run! If the company believes an IPO may be in its future, it’s better to “practice” before the company is required to be SOX compliant. A phased approach to implementation can drive important changes in company culture as it prepares to become a public organization. Recently published reports analyzing IPO activity reveal that material weaknesses reported by public companies were disproportionately attributable to recent IPO companies. Making a rapid change to SOX compliance can place a heavy burden on a newly public company.
2. Merger and Acquisition Deals – If the possibility of the company being sold to an M&A deal exists, enhanced financial reporting controls can provide the potential buyer with an added layer of security or comfort regarding the financial position of the company. Further, if the acquiring firm has an exit strategy that involves an IPO, the requirement for strong internal controls may be on the horizon.
3. Rapid Growth – Private companies that are growing rapidly, either organically or through acquisition, are susceptible to errors and fraud. The sophistication of these organizations often outpaces the skills and capacity of their support functions, including accounting, finance, and tax. Standard processes with preventive and detective controls can mitigate the risk that comes with rapid growth.
4. Assurance for Private Investors and Banks – Many users other than public shareholders may rely on financial information. The added security and accountability of having controls in place is a benefit to these users, as the enhanced credibility may impact the cost of borrowing for the organization.
5. Peer-Focused Industries – While not all industries are peer-focused, some place significant weight on the leading practices of their peers. Further, some industries require enhanced levels of security and control. For example, cannabis companies with a heavy regulatory burden, industries with sensitive customer data like lifesciences, and tech companies that handle customer data, often look to their peer group for leading practices, including their control environment. When the peer group is a mix of public and private companies, the private company can benefit from keeping pace with the leading practices of their public peers.
Private companies are not immune from the intense scrutiny of numerous stakeholders over accountability and risk. Companies with a clear understanding of the inherent risks that come from negligible accounting practices demonstrate their ability to think beyond the present, and to be better prepared for future growth or change in ownership.
Last year’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, H.R. 1 (“the Act”) created a federal capital gains tax deferral program through the opportunity zone statute, which is designed to attract private, long-term investments in low-income and economically distressed communities. Over 8,700 communities designated as Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZ), located across all 50 states, territories and Washington D.C, were nominated by local governments and confirmed by the Department of Treasury (DoT) in Notice 2018-48 issued in June 2018.
The statutory language of the Act introduced the tax incentive deferring taxable gains but it did not provide important details, including the types of gains eligible for deferral, the timing and specific requirements of qualified investments, and how investors report deferred gains. On October 19, 2018, the Treasury Department released proposed regulations, a revenue ruling, and tax forms to provide additional guidance on the opportunity zone tax incentive.
How QOZ tax incentives work
Simply stated, the opportunity zone statute allows for the deferral of capital gains if some or all of the amount of the capital gain recognized is invested in a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) by an eligible taxpayer. A QOF is any entity that invests in qualified opportunity zone property and is taxed as a partnership or corporation organized in any of the 50 states, US territories, or D.C. The QOF is required to hold at least 90 percent of its assets in qualified opportunity zone property.
To defer a capital gain, a taxpayer has 180 days from the date of sale or exchange of the appreciated property to invest the recognized gain in a QOF. The potential tax benefits of opportunity zone statute include:
Deferral of tax on capital gains invested in a QOF through 2019: Any recognized capital gain invested in a QOF through December 31, 2019 may be deferred until December 31, 2026 or eliminated when an investment in a QOF is disposed. There is an opportunity for taxpayers to make multiple investments in QOFs through the statute expiration date.
Potential to eliminate 15% to 100% of taxes for capital gains invested: Capital gains invested in a QOF are deemed to have an initial tax basis of zero. The taxpayer receives a 10% increase in tax basis if the investment is held five years and an additional 5% increase in tax basis after seven years. If an investment in a QOF is held for ten years, the taxpayer can elect to increase their tax basis in the QOF to fair market value upon disposition, which provides for a tax-free investment in the QOF. Tax is realized on the excess of the deferred gain over the basis in the QOF at the time of disposal.
Ability to rollover gains on disposal of investments in QOF: In general, the original deferred gain must be recognized by the taxpayer upon disposition of the investment in the QOF. If a taxpayer disposes of all of an investment in a QOF, triggering tax on the deferred gain and the qualified opportunity zone property, a taxpayer can make an investment in a new QOF and rollover the deferred gain. The rollover investment must be made before December 31, 2026.
Qualified Opportunity Zone Property
The purpose of the opportunity zone statute is to incentivize investment in low-income areas of the country in need of community development and improvement. IRC Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(2) provides guidance regarding the types of assets that will be considered qualified opportunity zone property if held by a QOF. In general, qualified opportunity zone property includes the following:
Newly issued stock held in a domestic corporation if such corporation is a qualified opportunity zone business,
Newly issued partnership interests in a domestic partnership if such partnership is a qualified opportunity zone business, or
Qualified opportunity zone business property.
Qualified opportunity zone business property is further defined in IRC Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(2)(D) as tangible property used in a business in a qualified opportunity zone that is either:
Land in a qualified opportunity zone,
A building in a qualified opportunity zone that is first used by the QOF or the qualified opportunity business,
A building in a qualified opportunity zone that was previously used but is “substantially improved” by the QOF or qualified opportunity business,
Equipment that was never previously used in a qualified opportunity zone, or
Equipment that was previously used in a qualified opportunity zone but it “substantially improved” by the QOF or the qualified opportunity business.
The opportunity zone statute defines “substantial improvement,” as an amount of investment in existing tangible property by a QOF, during any 30-month period, that exceeds the adjusted basis in the property at the beginning of the 30-month period. The Revenue Ruling issued clarifies that improvements made to land are not included in the total improvements for purposes of the “substantial improvement test” and the value of land is excluded from the adjusted basis calculations.
More details on qualifying as a QOF
The new guidance also provides details on what qualifies an investment vehicle as a QOF. And a draft of Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund was released alongside the guidance to demonstrate how corporations and partnerships can self-identify as a QOF by including the form with the filing of their tax return. Additional information provided includes guidelines for determining when a QOF begins, how a QOF can meet the requirements to be recognized as a qualified opportunity zone business, and what pre-existing entities may qualify as a QOF. And finally, guidance details the test required of QOFs to determine whether the entity holds the minimum threshold of assets in qualified opportunity zone property.
Considering a QOZ investment?
While the new guidance helps fill in many details, many questions are left unanswered and the Department of Treasury plans to release further guidance before the end of the year. If you’re planning on creating or investing in a QOF, we recommend consulting with an experienced tax advisor first.
The tax team at MGO is ready to assist you in navigating QOZs, QOFs, and other income tax concerns. For further guidance or to schedule a consultation, please contact us.
The legal, legislative, and regulatory landscape of cannabis in North America is dynamic and if there has been one constant since pioneering states implemented a legal ‘seed-to-sale’ adult-use market in 2014, it is change. And it is unrelenting.
To help cannabis entrepreneurs and investors keep up with the fast pace of change in the cannabis industry we will be providing monthly summaries of the latest regulatory and legislative news to provide a snapshot of latest happenings while also highlighting matters of interest looking forward.
This month the focus is on prominent federal legislative activity (e.g. the SAFE Act and the STATES Act), state legalization measures (e.g. NJ, NY, IL, and others), and two bills in Colorado that have the potential to attract out-of-state investment to that market.
Changes in federal cannabis legislation
With control of the House of Representatives being transferred to the Democratic party, several bills that have the potential to profoundly impact the cannabis landscape have advanced in Congress. For example, the last week of March saw the House Financial Services Committee move forward the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act to a full House vote, reportedly “within weeks.” Following the momentum of the House bill, U.S. Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Cory Gardner (R-CO) have introduced the companion bill in the Senate.
The latest SAFE iteration addresses the cannabis banking crisis and includes amendments that offer protection to insurance companies and other financial services companies.
The banking issue is long-standing and predates even the implementation of recreational cannabis in the US. The lack of straight forward access to fundamental banking services for the cannabis industry creates a multitude of challenges, most notably the operational and financial difficulties of a multi-billion-dollar industry operating almost entirely in cash. This has obvious implications for public safety and potential diversion to the black market, among other concerns.
The inability to access banking services is often identified as a major hindrance to market entry for large and well-resourced corporations and removal of this barrier could herald a seismic shift in investment into the cannabis industry. At time of writing the House Bill had 152 cosponsors, including 12 Republicans, whereas the Senate bill has 20 co-sponsors.
Adding further momentum to the SAFE bill, last week Last week, Secretary Steve Mnuchin offered his support for a legislative fix for the banking issues facing the cannabis industry. “There is not a Treasury solution to this. There is not a regulator solution to this,” he said. “If this is something that Congress wants to look at on a bipartisan basis, I’d encourage you to do this.”
Another potentially substantial piece of legislation is the Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States Act (STATES Act), which aims to reduce conflict between federal and state laws as they relate to cannabis. The STATES Act is a potential gamechanger for the cannabis industry, allowing legal certainty for companies seeking to operate in dozens of jurisdictions across the US.
Although this legislation stalled in December, it was reintroduced on April 4th, alongside other measures, which include:
the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act that would effectively legalize marijuana at the federal level by removing it from the Controlled Substances Act.
The Marijuana Justice Act of 2019
The extent to which these bills have bipartisan support may be crucial if they are move beyond the House.
Four steps forward and two steps back in state legalization efforts
It has been a mixed month in terms of advancing cannabis legalization measures at the state level. On the one hand, there has been progress in multiple states, such as Connecticut, Illinois, and New Hampshire. While on the other hand there was a couple of snags holding up the implementation of recreational markets in New Jersey and New York.
The New Jersey cannabis legalization bill was pulled due to lack of support although Gov. Murphey (D) reportedly stated he remained committed to getting the bill passed.
New York dropped cannabis legalization from its budget bill where it was viewed as more likely to pass, however, regulators remain optimistic of progress later in the year. The New York City Council also voted to ban cannabis testing for job applicants.
A General Law Committee in the Connecticut Legislature approved a bill that would legalize an adult-use cannabis market in the state.
A bill to legalize retail cannabis in Illinois was introduced and passed to a subcommittee for further consideration.
Governor of Guam signed a bill legalizing cannabis, becoming the first US territory to do so.
Despite the hiccups outlined above, there is a clear trend towards legal cannabis across the US. Moreover, several states took steps towards expansion or liberalization of their medical cannabis markets. Certainly in the long term, the outlook is optimistic for the cannabis industry on a number of fronts.
Back to the future as Colorado looks to position itself as an investment hub for cannabis
When Colorado became the first state to implement an adult-us cannabis framework in 2014, out of state investment was restricted. This allowed the state to build upon its existing medical cannabis market.
The understandable caution has since been questioned, however, and a Bill offering more flexibility in investment passed both the Colorado House and Senate in 2018, only for then Gov. Hickenlooper to veto it. In 2019, a replacement Bill was introduced and has recently passed its third reading in the House unamended.
As an established market with mature regulations and market stability, Colorado has low-risk potential when compared to emerging markets in other states – although competition is likely to be strong, with ever-thinning margins as prices continue to drop in the state.
Out-of-state investors exploring options in Colorado may be interested in acquiring social consumption licenses in Denver, or seek opportunities for market expansion in the delivery segment of the market. If passed, HB19-1234 would allow licensed dispensaries to offer these services for the first time.
