Tax Reform Archives - MGO CPA | Tax, Audit, and Consulting Services

Raising Capital: Navigating Tax Challenges When Classifying Debt Versus Equity

The corporate fundraising environment has changed dramatically this year due to several factors, including a wide sell off in the equity markets, high interest rates, inflation, and a general tightening of the credit markets. Prior to the recent downturn, companies had the luxury of spending to develop their products and marketing ideas first, and then focusing on turning a profit later.

Because of these newly tightened conditions, companies may face challenges when raising capital, forcing them to adopt a more thoughtful approach to seek funding. Likewise, investors will want to ensure their priorities are protected and their returns met. The combination of a given borrower’s need for capital and a financer’s desire to seek favorable returns may lead to the creation of agreements that have characteristics of both debt and equity. As such, it is crucial for all parties involved to understand the resulting tax classification and the treatment of these arrangements, so all expectations are met.

The taxation of debt and equity

For borrowers, the difference between debt and equity can be critical because interest payments are generally tax deductible and subject to certain limitations. Dividends or other payments related to equity would not be deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Job Act (TCJA) of 2017, one main limit on interest deductibility is the IRC 163(j) limit on the amount of business interest that can be deducted each year. This limit is calculated as 30 percent of adjusted taxable income, which prior to the 2022 tax year closely resembled earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). However, starting with the 2022 tax year adjusted taxable income excludes depreciation and amortization, becoming EBIT. This should result in a lower limit on the amount of interest expense that can be deducted each year. Any interest expense exceeding this annual limit can be carried forward to future years.

Determining if an arrangement is debt or equity for federal income tax purposes

Classifying an arrangement as debt or equity is made on a case-by-case basis depending on the facts and circumstances of a given agreement. While there is currently little guidance in this area beyond case law, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued a list of factors to consider when questioning whether something is debt or equity. (Keep in mind, however, that the IRS states not one factor is conclusive.) The factors include whether:

An agreement contains an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain on demand or at maturity,
A lender can enforce the payment of principal and interest by the borrower, and
A borrower is thinly capitalized.

The courts have also established a broader — but similar — list of factors to consider when determining whether an instrument should be treated as debt or equity. Both the IRS and the courts have generally placed more weight on whether an instrument provides for the rights and remedies of a creditor, whether the parties intend to establish a debtor-creditor relationship, and if the intent is economically feasible. Some factors include:

Participation in management (as a result of advances),
Identity of interest between creditor and stockholder,
Thinness of capital structure in relation to debt, and
Ability of a corporation to obtain credit from outside sources.

For international companies, the characterization of debt or equity when considered in a cross-border funding arrangement is important, as withholding tax rates may apply to interest payments and may differ from tax rates applied to dividends. Further, withholding tax obligations occurs when a cash payment is made. If you have a cross-border arrangement, it is crucial to know if you have debt or equity on your hands.

Special rules related to payment-in-kind

Once it is determined that an agreement should be classified as debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes, some borrowers may prefer to set aside interest payments or pay interest with securities, which is often referred to as payment-in-kind (PIK). This is generally done to preserve cash flow for operations and growth of the business. When a borrower chooses this route, U.S. federal income tax rules will impute an interest payment to the lender.

While using a PIK mechanism will not automatically result in the debt being recharacterized as equity for federal income tax purposes, it can support viewing the instrument as equity.

Limits to deductible debt interest

There are limitations that can apply to interest deductibility. As noted above, IRC 163(j) limits deductibility of business interest; for a corporation, this is deemed to be all interest regardless of use. Another provision that can result in interest deductibility limitation is IRC 163(l), which applies to certain convertible notes and similar instruments held by corporations.

For cannabis operators, it is important to consider that IRC 280E disallows interest deductions. Hence, it is highly detrimental for cannabis operators to issue debt from entities that are cannabis plant-touching.

How we can help

Due to the nature of the debt versus equity analysis, companies thinking about fundraising should plan on how they intend to perform the raise and whether to have the raise treated as equity or debt. If debt classification is desired, a borrower should take the steps needed to strengthen the facts of the transaction to support the arrangement as a debt instrument.

MGO’s dedicated tax team has extensive experience advising companies across industries on capital-raising, debt refinancing and restructuring, recapitalizations, and other tax transactions. If you are planning to fundraise, or you are currently in the process of conducting a debt versus equity analysis, contact us today.

Tax Highlights of the Inflation Reduction Act

On August 16th, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 into law. The Act is a slimmed down version of the Biden Administration’s proposed Build Back Better legislation and addresses several key areas including:

Increasing Internal Revenue Service (IRS) budget
Implementing a corporate tax minimum
Instituting and increasing tax credits focused on investing in green technologies

Notable items that were not addressed in the IRA include removing the $10,000 SALT cap and mandatory capitalization of research and development (R&D) expenses, both provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

The bill is over 300 pages in length with a number of wide-ranging components. In the following summary we’ll provide the key points that will be affecting taxpayers in the coming years.

Additional funding to the IRS for tax enforcement

One of the most talked-about provisions involves increased funding for the IRS.

Key details:

Approximately $80 billion in funding over the next 10 years for tax services, operations support, business system modernization, and enforcement
- Enforcement – $46 billion
- Operations support – $25 billion
- Business systems modernization – $5 billion
- Taxpayer services – $3 billion
An estimated $124 to $200 billion will be generated from enforcement and compliance efforts
Enforcement is focused on taxpayers – both corporate and non-corporate – with income greater than $400,000

Extension of the business loss limitation of noncorporate taxpayers

The IRA extends the excess business loss limitation for noncorporate taxpayers.

Key details:

Two year extension on IRC Sec. 461(l) until December 31, 2028
IRC Sec. 461(l) limits noncorporate taxpayers from deducting business losses above thresholds that are annually indexed for inflation
These limits are $540,000 for married filing jointly and $270,000 for single and married filing single for the 2022 tax year
Suspended amounts are converted to net operating losses and may be able to be used in subsequent years

Excise tax on repurchases of corporate stock

The IRA includes a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases by domestic public companies listed on an established securities market. The tax applies to repurchases executed after December 31st, 2022.

Key details:

1% excise tax on the full market value (FMV) of stock repurchased by publicly traded US corporations
Will impact redemptions and certain acquisitions and repurchases of publicly traded foreign corporation stock
Not an income tax for purposes of ASC 740
Includes special rules for “applicable foreign corporations” and “surrogate foreign corporations”
Notable exceptions:
- Stock is contributed to employer sponsored retirement plan
- Stock repurchase is part of a corporate reorganization
- Total value of stock repurchased during the taxable year does not exceed $1 million
- Repurchase by securities dealer in ordinary course of business
- If the repurchase qualifies as a dividend
- If the repurchase is by a regulated investment company (RIC) or a real estate investment trust (REIT)

15% corporate alternative minimum tax

The IRA reinstates the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT) for large corporations, which had been previously eliminated by the Trump Administration’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Two key elements to note is that this revised AMT only impacts corporations with annual profits exceeding $1 billion, and includes carve-outs for certain manufacturers and subsidiaries of private equity firms.

Key details:

15% tax on adjusted financial statement income (i.e., this would be a book minimum tax)
Affects tax years beginning after December 31, 2022
Applies to corporations with profits over $1 billion based off adjusted financial income
For US corporations with foreign parents, it would apply to income earned in the US of $100 million or more of average annual earnings in three prior years and where the overall international financial reporting group has income of $1 billion or more
Treatment of split offs remains uncertain. Even though these are tax-free reorganizations for tax purposes, gain is recorded for financial accounting purposes
Joint Committee on Taxation expects that this new tax would apply to only about 150 corporate taxpayers, approximately equal to 30% of the Fortune 500

Tax credit additions and modifications

A significant number of provisions add or enhance credits and incentives that pertain to domestic research and green energy initiatives. Noteworthy changes include:

Increased small business payroll tax credits for research activities:

Qualified payroll tax credit for increasing research activities raised from $250,000 to $500,000
- First $250,000 will be applied against the FICA payroll tax liability. Second $250,000 will be applied against the employer portion of Medicare payroll tax.
- Applies for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022
- Limited to tax imposed for calendar quarter with unused amounts being carried forward
Qualifying small businesses are required to have less than $5 million in gross receipts in current year and no gross receipts prior to the 5 year period ending with the current year

Green initiative tax credits and incentives:

Credits for purchasing new and previously-owned clean vehicles
Extension of IRC Sec. 45L – New Energy Efficient Home Credit – extended to qualified new energy efficient homes acquired before January 1, 2033. Increase value of available credit for single-family homes to $2,500 and modified the credit available for multi-family homes.
Extension, increase, and modifications to IRC Sec. 25C nonbusiness energy property credit
Extension and modification of IRC Sec. 25D residential clean energy credit
IRC Sec. 48 energy credit for businesses and investors
- Expansion of qualifying property, extension of credit including phasedown and phaseout rules, and introduction of incentives
Credit for producing energy from renewable sources (IRC Sec. 45)
- Retroactive for facilities placed in service after December 31, 2021
- Extends beginning of construction deadline to projects beginning construction before January 1, 2025 including solar energy facilities
Increased energy credit for solar and wind facilities in certain low-income communities
New credit for clean hydrogen production
New credit for zero-emission nuclear power
Extension of incentives for biodiesel, renewal diesel, and alternative fuels
Extension of biofuel producer credit
New income and excise tax credits allowed for sustainable aviation fuel
Modification of IRC Sec. 179D – Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Deductions
- Modification of building qualifications
- Deduction increased from $1.88 per square foot to up to $5 per qualified square foot
Changes in depreciation for certain green energy properties

Final thoughts

The Inflation Reduction Act should have wide-ranging impacts on taxpayers, especially large corporations and high-net-worth individuals. In the coming weeks our tax leaders will dive into the specifics of the legislation, outline immediate and long-term impacts, and provide tax-planning strategies and considerations.

Businesses Can File Retroactive Claims for the Employee Retention Tax Credit

Many people are excited about the pace of economic recovery, and it’s fair to say we are moving in the right direction. But as the excitement continues and life feels more like it is returning to normal after the pandemic, make sure you don’t forget to take advantage of some of the programs that were put in place to help us through the COVID-19 crisis.

Employee Retention Tax Credit

The Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERTC) is a refundable tax credit created by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, to encourage businesses to keep employees on their payroll. For 2020, the credit is 70% of up to $10,000 in wages paid by an employer whose business was fully or partially suspended because of COVID-19 or whose gross receipts declined by more than 50%

For 2021, an employer can receive 70 percent of the first $10,000 of qualified wages paid per employee in each qualifying quarter. The credit applies to wages paid from March 13, 2020, through December 31, 2021. And the cost of employer-paid health benefits can be considered part of employees’ qualified wages.

It’s an attractive credit if you qualify.

Eligible businesses

The credit applies to all employers regardless of size, including tax exempt organizations that had a full or partial shutdown because of a government order limiting commerce due to COVID-19 during 2020 or 2021. With the exceptions of state and local governments or small businesses that take Small Business Administration loans, this credit is available to almost everyone.

Of course, there is some fine print:
• To qualify, gross receipts must have declined more than 50 percent during a 2020 or 2021 calendar quarter, when compared to the same quarter in the prior year.
• For employers with 100 or fewer full-time employees, all employee wages qualify for the credit, whether the employer is open for business or shutdown.
• For employers with more than 100 full-time employees, qualified wages are wages paid to employees when they are not providing services due to COVID-19-related circumstances.

One bright point about the ERTC is that employers can be immediately reimbursed for the credit by reducing the amount of payroll taxes they would usually have withheld from employees’ wages. That was a nice touch by the IRS.

Retroactive claims for the ERTC

Although it appears the IRS tried to make this as easy as possible, you may still need a tax professional to sort it out. For instance, if your business had a substantial decline in gross receipts but has now recovered, you can still claim the credit for the difficult period

Retroactive claims for refunds will probably be delayed because currently everything is delayed at the IRS. The credit can be claimed on amended payroll tax returns as long as the statute of limitations remains open, which is three years from the date of filing. So you have some time to claim the credit, but why wait?

Keep December 2021 in mind

The economy is in a state of change, and it is fair to say that we are once again in uncharted territory. On the positive side, there seems to be significant resources and support for businesses from both government and consumers. You and your tax professional should keep your eyes open for credits and benefits to make sure you don’t miss any opportunitie

The ERTC expires in December 2021. Though it may be difficult to think about year-end in the middle of the summer, you’ll want to figure out your position on this credit before December. A tax professional can help you understand the ERTC and help you decide on your next step.

About the author

Michael Silvio is a partner at MGO. He has more than 25 years of experience in public accounting and tax and has served a variety of public and private businesses in the manufacturing, distribution, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology sectors.

The Real Oversight is NOT Having an Audit Committee

By Jim Godsey, CPA, CGMA, Partner, MGO

Everything changes, except when it doesn’t

Time and time again we’ve seen reactions to various accounting scandals, after which new policies, procedures, and legislation are created and implemented. An example of this is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002, which was a direct result of the accounting scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Tyco, and Arthur Andersen.

SOX was established to provide additional auditing and financial regulations for publicly held companies to address the failures in corporate governance. Primarily it sets forth a requirement that the governing board, through the use of an audit committee, fulfill its corporate governance and oversight responsibilities for financial reporting by implementing a system that includes internal controls, risk management, and internal and external audit functions.

Governments experience challenges and oversight responsibility similar to those encountered by corporate America. Governance risks can be mitigated by applying the provisions of SOX to the public sector.

Some states and local governments have adopted similar requirements to SOX but, unfortunately, in many cases only after cataclysmic events have already taken place. In California, we only need to look back at the bankruptcy of Orange County and the securities fraud investigation surrounding the City of San Diego as examples of audit committees that were established in response to a breakdown in governance.

Taking your audit committee on the right mission

Governments typically establish audit committees for a number of reasons, which include addressing the risk of fraud, improving audit capabilities, strengthening internal controls, and using it as a tool that increases accountability and transparency. As a result, the mission of the audit committee often includes responsibility for:

Oversight of the external audit.
Oversight of the internal audit function.
Oversight for internal controls and risk management.

Chart(er) your course

Most successful audit committees are created by a formal mandate by the governing board and, in some cases, a voter-approved charter. Mandates establish the mission of the committee and define the responsibilities and activities that the audit committee is expected to accomplish. A wide variety of items can be included in the mandate.

Creating the governing board’s resolution is the first step on the road to your audit committee’s success.

Follow the leader(ship)

In practice we see a combination of these attributes, ranging from the full board acting as the audit committee, committees with one or more independent outsiders appointed by the board, and/or members from management and combinations of all of the above. While there are advantages and disadvantages for all of these approaches, each government needs to evaluate how to work within their own governance structure to best arrive at the most workable solution.

Strike the right balance between cost and risk

The overriding responsibility of the audit committee is to perform its oversight responsibilities related to the significant risks associated with the financial reporting and operational results of the government. This is followed closely by the need to work with management, internal auditors and the external auditors in identifying and implementing the appropriate internal controls that will reduce those risks to an acceptable level. While the cost of establishing and enforcing a level of zero risk tolerance is cost prohibitive, the audit committee should be looking for the proper balance of cost and a reduced level of risk.

Engage your audit committee with regular meetings

Depending on the complexity and activity levels of the government, the audit committee should meet at least three times a year. In larger governments, with robust systems and reporting, it’s a good practice to call for monthly meetings with the ability to add special purpose meetings as needed. These meetings should address the following:

External Auditors

Confirmation of the annual financial statement and compliance audit, including scope and timing.
Ad hoc reporting on issues where potential fraud or abuse have been identified.
Receipt and review of the final financial statements and auditor’s reports
Opinion on the financial statements and compliance audit;
Internal controls over financial reporting and grants; and
Violations of laws and regulations.

Internal Auditors

Review of updated risk assessments over identified areas of risk.
Review of annual audit plan, including status of the prior year’s efforts.
Status reports of ongoing and completed audits.
Reporting of the status of corrective action plans, including conditions noted, management’s response, steps taken to correct the conditions, expected time-line for full implementation of the corrective action and planned timing to verify the corrective action plan has been implemented.

Establish resources that are at the ready

Audit committees should be given the resources and authority to acquire additional expertise as and when required. These resources may include, but are not limited to, technical experts in accounting, auditing, operations, debt offerings, securities lending, cybersecurity, and legal services.

Taking extra steps now will save time later

While no system can guarantee breakdowns will not occur, a properly established audit committee will demonstrate for both elected officials and executive management that on behalf of their constituents they have taken the proper steps to reduce these risks to an acceptable tolerance level. History has shown over and over again that breakdowns in governance lead to fraud, waste and abuse. Don’t be deluded into thinking that it will never happen to your organization. Make sure it doesn’t happen on your watch.

10 Things Government Contractors Need to Know About Tax Reform

The $1.5 trillion new tax law represents the most sweeping change to tax code in a generation. Tax reform of this magnitude will have broad implications for government contractors. While accountants and tax departments wade through the 185-page legislation, here are the top 10 things government contractors need to know:

1. The corporate tax rate was permanently reduced from 35 percent to 21 percent.

The top corporate tax rate has been permanently reduced from 35 percent to a flat rate of 21 percent, beginning in 2018. Unlike all other provisions in the new law, including tax breaks for individuals, the new corporate tax rate provision does not expire.

2. There’s a tax break for owners of pass-through entities.

The new law provides owners of pass-through businesses — which include individuals, estates, and trusts — with a deduction of up to 20 percent of their domestic qualified business income, whether it is attributable to income earned through an S corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, or disregarded entity. Without the new deduction, taxpayers would pay 2018 taxes on their share of qualified earnings at rates up to 37 percent. With the new 20 percent deduction, the tax rate on such income could be as low as 29.6 percent. It should again be noted that certain service industries are excluded from the preferential rate, unless taxable income is below $207,500 (for single filers) and $415,000 (for joint filers), under which the benefit of the deduction is phased out.

3. There might be huge tax benefits to changing your company’s current choice of entity.

Taxpayers should consider evaluating the choice of entity used to operate their businesses. The 21 percent reduced corporate tax rate may increase the popularity of corporations. However, factors such as the new 20 percent deduction for pass-through income, expected use of after-tax cash earnings, and potential exit values will significantly complicate these analyses. The potential after-tax cash benefits ultimately realized by owners could make choice-of-entity determinations one of the most important decisions taxpayers will now make.

4. There have been significant changes to the international tax system.

In connection with these changes, some U.S. shareholders who own stock in certain foreign corporations will have to pay a one-time “transition tax” on their share of accumulated overseas earnings. Other changes include a “participation exemption,” which is a 100 percent dividend-received deduction that permits certain domestic C corporations to receive dividends from their foreign subsidiaries without being taxed on such dividends when certain conditions are satisfied. There is also a new requirement that certain U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) include in income their share of the “global intangible low-taxed income” of such CFCs. Finally, there are new measures to deter base erosion and promote U.S. production.

5. The corporate AMT and DPAD are dead, but Research Tax Credits live on.

The law repeals the Section 199 Domestic Production Activities Deduction (DPAD) and the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) for tax years beginning after 2017. The Research Tax Credit was retained and is now more valuable given the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent.

6. They’ve scrapped NOL carrybacks and limited the use of carryforwards.

Previously, businesses were able to offset current taxable income by claiming net operating losses (NOLs), generally eligible for a two-year carryback and 20-year carryforward. Now NOLs for tax years ending after 2017 cannot be carried back, but can be indefinitely carried forward. In addition, NOLs for tax years beginning in 2018 will be subject to an 80 percent limitation. Companies will have to track their NOLs in different buckets and consider cost-recovery strategy on depreciable assets in applying the 80 percent limitation.

7. Tax reform’s impact on accounting methods may change when revenue is recognized, but new provisions could also lead to temporary and permanent tax benefits.

Under the new law, accrual basis taxpayers must now recognize income no later than the taxable year in which such income is taken into account as revenue in an applicable financial statement.

However, new provisions also provide favorable methods of accounting that were not previously available. That, coupled with the reduction in tax rates, creates a favorable and unique environment for filing accounting method changes.

There are many method changes still available for the 2017 tax year. Taxpayers should evaluate current accounting methods to identify any actionable opportunities to accelerate deductions and defer income for the 2017 tax year, which could result in significant tax savings.

8. There are new rules for bonus depreciation and full expensing on new and used property.

The new tax law allows a 100 percent first-year deduction — up from 50 percent — for the adjusted basis of qualifying assets placed in service after Sept. 27, 2017, and before Jan. 1, 2023, with a gradual phase down in subsequent years before sunsetting after 2026. The definition of qualifying property was also expanded to include used property purchased in an arm’s-length transaction. Businesses should pay close attention to any qualifying asset acquisitions made during the fourth quarter of 2017, as the full expensing can be taken on the 2017 return if the property was acquired and placed in service after Sept. 27, 2017.

Additionally, under new tax law, taxpayers may now deduct up to $1 million under Section 179 for properties placed in service beginning in 2018 — double the previous allowable amount. The phase-out threshold is increased to $2.5 million and will be indexed for inflation in future years and the types of qualifying property has been expanded.

9. The availability of the cash method of accounting expanded for small businesses.

Beginning in 2018, the average annual gross receipts threshold for businesses to use the cash method increases from $5 million to $25 million. Additionally, small businesses who meet the $25 million gross receipts threshold are not required to account for inventories and are exempt from the uniform capitalization rules. The $25 million is indexed for inflation for tax years beginning after 2018.

10. Now is the time to assess total rewards strategies.

Tax reform significantly impacts various components of an employer’s total compensation program — namely the expansion of the $1 million deduction cap on pay to covered employees; disallowed deductions for transportation fringe benefits provided to employees; income inclusion for employer-paid moving expenses; further deduction limitations on certain meal and entertainment expenses; and a two-year tax credit for employer-paid family and medical leave programs. As the IRS releases guidance, employers must immediately modify their payroll systems to reflect tax reform changes impacting individual taxpayers.

For more information about the impact of tax reform on the Government Contracting industry, please reach out to us.