Secure your Supply Chain for 2023 and Beyond 

Executive Summary 

  • Recent global events have emphasized the need for reviewing and strengthening the supply chain for manufacturers from both an operational and cost savings perspective.  
  • A “China Plus One” strategy is a good start but may prove inadequate depending on the nature of a disruption. 
  • Supply chain backup plans need to be agile, flexible, and built with contingencies for undetermined issues.  
  • Raising prices may address some concerns but also causes customer issues and is not a long-term solution. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, organizations across different trades and industries faced a number of operational obstacles caused by supply chain disruptions. From economic uncertainty, to labor shortages, to rising costs, leaders had to find alternatives to create an agile and adaptable framework for this ever-changing market. With the global tax overhaul where juristidictions are racing for the middle and not the bottom, companies are faced with continuous change. 

Our International Tax and Transfer Pricing leaders have developed methods and problem-solving techniques for local and global networks. These approaches help businesses address their supply chain challenges, as well as give guidance on how to continually evaluate and adjust their strategic initiatives while considering tax and transfer pricing risks in their supply chain decisions. The proverbial tax tail should not wag the dog but it should not be ignored either. Companies should consider performing transfer pricing analyses to determine how to allocate the financial impact of the changes to the supply chain among related entities and ensure appropriate remuneration to those entities involved in supply chain initiatives for their respective functions performed and risk incurred in the process. 

In this article, we will answer three of our most-asked questions and provide the necessary steps to transform and optimize supply chains amid constant uncertainty — now and in the future.  

#1: Can adopting the “China Plus One” strategy diversify my supply chain? 

In recent years, most U.S.-based businesses and consumers have learned that global supply chains have become too dependent on China. Prior to 2020, business leaders had already begun shifting away from China in the wake of the previous administration’s tariff challenges, intangible property (IP) disputes, and the ensuing trade war. Factory and port shutdowns in China in the early days of the pandemic and the issues that have followed were wakeup calls for those that hadn’t implemented alternative sources of supply. An enduring lesson of the past few years is that sole sourcing from any vendor or vendors in one location comes with a high-risk level. In renewing the supply chain, companies must consider the economic climate, the political environment, the ease of doing business, and personnel availability. Tax and transfer pricing is generally not in the forefront nor should it be. But giving it some thought after consider the already mentioned items may pay significant dividends. 

Building redundancy into the supply chain at different tiers and maintaining inventory levels have become necessary steps for international manufacturers.The China Plus One strategy has been on the radar of companies that operate in China for several years, but the need to diversify supply chains is now a priority, with many manufacturers actively pursuing supplementary sourcing from another country in Southeast Asia. However, the supply chain crisis of the past two years shows this strategy may also be failing. As long as the goods produced are an ocean away from the markets that consume them, uncertainty from various disruptive factors can lead to shortages, higher costs, lower revenues, and customer dissatisfaction. 

Actions moving forward: 

Along with decoupling from China, truly de-risking the supply chain comes down to three factors:  

  1. Optionality 
  1. Redundancy 
  1. Market proximity 

While fully onshoring production and supply sources may not be operationally, economically, or logistically feasible, the supply network is less risky when it is closer to the market where it is widely consumed. 

Consider engaging or contracting new stateside suppliers and local manufacturers to better serve the U.S. market. You should also review your supply base for any overreliance on a single source or geography. After that, you can research the best options to decrease the distance between where your products are produced and purchased. Insourcing, onshoring, nearshoring and acquisitions are all viable options. The approach that makes sense for your business must consider cost, capacity, quality, control, and reputation. Regardless of your approach, the goal should be to improve supply chain resilience and flexibility so you can better manage  disruptions. 

#2: Does having a back-up plan reduce supply chain disruptions? 

Preparation and readiness may help with how your company fares during industry interruptions. A back-up plan should have  built-in agility so it  can be adapted and activated quickly based on a variety of external factors. 

In recent years, manufacturers learned static backup plans were not adequate to address rapidly changing global conditions. These backup strategies were not agile enough to be effective amid complex disruption. Consequently, manufacturers were challenged to get the level of service they needed from existing suppliers or quickly identify new suppliers, resulting in processes that simply were not feasible from an implementation or sustainable cost standpoint. 

Backup plans are a necessity, but they’re generally based on known risks. As global supply chains grow more intertwined and the universe of uncertainty expands, new risks and variables come into play. You can’t just plan for one contingency; you need to weigh the possible outcomes for multiple options across different scenarios. Changes in manufacturing locations and sourcing strategies aren’t the only scenarios worth evaluating, nor is resilience to disruption the only outcome worth measuring. For example, if you’re considering expanding into a new market or adding to your product mix, those strategic adjustments should be factored into your supply chain model and assessed for plausibility. Tax liabilities, trade compliance risks, and total cost to serve are no less critical considerations than deliverability or lead times. 

The reality is you cannot prepare for every contingency, so scenario planning needs to evolve to detect signals of disruption earlier and enable greater agility in supply chain decision-making when the unexpected occurs. For example, if your company is planning on vertical integration thath will be the cause of significant in-country hiring, you must assess the benefits of  employment credits and incentives that can help reduce overhead costs. 

Actions moving forward: 

Review your supply chain model to:  

  • reflect current constraints; 
  • incorporate points of vulnerability; and 
  • conduct a scenario planning exercise to address a specific problem or inform your next strategic move.  

Ideally, you should simulate multiple scenarios to pressure test the supply chain, anticipate issues, and chart the best path forward when disruption hits. Scenario planning should become a regular business practice so you can quickly respond to unforeseen events. 

#3: Will raising prices offset the increasing costs of materials and logistics? 

Although raising prices is not the only way to successfully reduce costs, there are some tradeoffs that will have to be considered. Higher costs are an unfortunate reality for most manufacturers in the current supply chain environment. Because cost reductions are not easy to accomplish, many companies are shifting their focus to cost containment within areas of their supply chains that they can control. Higher costs are a sure way of reducing taxable income and where possible, selectively deciding where the spend will occur in the supply chain may not reduce the impact of inflation or costs being spent – however it may impact the amount of tax dollars being spent. Tax, like all other costs, is an expense that should be viewed and considered for cost reduction measures. 

For example, intercompany movements are often rife with inefficiency or seldom get the level of scrutiny they deserve. If parts and finished goods are shipped intercompany, ask why: Is there a value add, is it because your business has always done it that way, or is it an enabling factor to hedge against process inefficiencies? If your global supply chain is failing to consistently meet the needs of local markets, does the original rationale for keeping production and sources of supply at a distance still stand? Or would it be beneficial to establish a near or local market capability? Using models like a contract manufacturer can be a quicker way to further evaluate whether it makes sense to establish an in-house capability. 

It’s also a good time to revisit lean initiatives that you may have previously dismissed or deprioritized—though be cautious of prioritizing efficiency at the expense of resilience. And beyond your own four walls, there are a few foundational measures of good supply chain hygiene that may help with cost takeout: 

  • Shift from transportation spot rates to contract rates to stabilize pricing. 
  • Ensure you have contracts with alternate suppliers; don’t rely on a single source. 
  • Encourage your customers to optimize order volume for full truck or container loads through more rigorous enforcement of transactional service standards. 

These measures may help manage costs to some degree but are unlikely to completely offset them. By raising prices, you will more than likely create frustration and confusion among your customers. However, if you find yourself absolutely needing to raise prices, it’s better to be upfront and honest rather than taking a below-the-radar approach. 

Another way to address rising costs, rather than passing additional costs onto all your customers, is to consider segmenting them and developing pricing strategies based on level of priority.  

Actions moving forward: 

Perform an in-depth analysis of your customer base and product suite to understand the most and least profitable segments. Consider implementing a price segmentation strategy that shifts the heaviest burden of cost increases to your least profitable customers. Also, take a close look at your least profitable product segments and how they line up with cost distribution. Do you have slow-moving SKUs driving a disproportionate amount of costs? It may make sense to rationalize them. 

We can help strengthen your supply chain

Now is the perfect time for manufacturers to gain competitive advantage by optimizing production and delivery processes and prioritizing long-term spending goals. Our International Tax and Transfer Pricing and Management Advisory practice leaders are ready to assess your current supply chain, identify potential points of weakness, adjusting transfer pricing policies, and assist you in implementing strengthening procedures. Reach out to our team to learn how we can reduce your risk and power production.  

Navigating Turbulent Times for Global Supply Chain Management

Executive summary

  • Many international companies are struggling with their supply chain management amid external factors playing out on the global stage.  
  • To mitigate the challenges, you should be aware of the current trends in supply management as well as strategies to improve your resilience and flexibility.  
  • Current trends include AI and automation, supply chain as a service, circular supply chains, risk management and stability, and sustainability.  
  • Diversifying your supply chain and creating a backup plan can help you remain agile.  
  • Know the tax implications of your supply chain.

The last two years have seen major disruption in supply chain management — and throughout 2023, that turbulence is expected to continue. The freight supply and demand equation was a common issue during the pandemic and recovery period. We’re now seeing how the Russian-Ukraine conflict is reshaping the global supply chain for many companies. And amid all the economic uncertainty, supply shortages, and rising costs, the U.S. and EU (European Union) have been heavily investing in infrastructure, putting even more pressure on China with the U.S.-imposed tariffs’ strenuous implications.  

While managing your supply chain is currently a challenge, you’re not completely at the mercy of these external factors which are generally outside of your control. There are strategies to mitigate the impact to your supply chain: your goals should be to both improve your supply chain resilience and flexibility to allow you to better manage the disruptions — those foreseen and unforeseen.  

Our International Tax team breaks down some of the current trends and strategies to be aware of.  

Trends in supply chain management

Some of the main trends in supply chain management include artificial intelligence and automation, supply chain as a service, circular supply chains, risk management and stability, and an increased focus on sustainability. Now, more than ever, mid-market multinational companies must be strategic. These additional constraints cause strain on these companies that are being forced to pivot to address these issues among additional disruption.  

Odds are, you’ve been rethinking the way you currently manage your supply chain — because the global situations aren’t changing. The China tariffs are unlikely to disband soon, and there seems to be no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.  

Diversifying your supply chain

Many agree that the global supply chain was too dependent on China, and now companies are considering breaking away from the Asia Pacific region to look at the Mexican maquiladora or IMMEX programs. Both these programs are, for all intents and purposes, synonymous, save for one detail: the IMMEX added shelter companies as a modality. Under this shelter program, companies may set up operations in Mexico without establishing a legal Mexican entity.  

These programs have been in existence since the 1960s, so they’ve proven their worth — however, they don’t work for everyone, so it’s worth perusing other options. It’s important to remember that sourcing from vendors in only one location, regardless of where that location is geographically, is accompanied by elevated risk.  

To mitigate this, you should not only diversify your supply chain but also create redundancies to avoid a single point of failure. In addition, bringing your sources of supply closer to where you operate also reduces the opportunity for risk. Engage with new suppliers and manufacturers in the Americas, for instance, and analyze your current suppliers to see if there is any one region you rely on more heavily already, then minimize the distance between your production and purchasing — without, of course, sacrificing quality, cost, control, and reputation. By optimizing your global footprint, you can maximize your production opportunities, minimize risk, and scout new vendors and locations for future efficiency.  

Devising a backup plan for supply chain disruptions to address multiple contingencies  

At the end of the day, we know that no matter how sophisticated or agile your supply chain backup plan is, external factors — which are never static — can affect things in unexpected ways. With rapidly and ceaselessly changing global conditions, there’s no way to account for everything you could encounter.  

But there are ways to prepare. Plan for multiple contingencies, weighing their outcomes. Don’t forget to think broadly and for new opportunities — for example, if you’re looking at expanding into new markets or territories or want to add a new product line, you must assess their plausibleness under a variety of conditions (and not just logistical conditions, like lead times and delivery … but also tax liabilities and compliance, too). 

Keep your supply chain planning agile and ready to evolve by reviewing its current model and updating it to ensure it reflects the restraints and vulnerabilities you’re presently dealing with. By making a step-by-step plan — for multiple scenarios — you can chart your path forward, regardless of what unfolds on the global stage in these uncertain times.  

How MGO can help

Knowing the tax implications of your supply chain is crucial to your global success, and our experienced International Tax team can help you navigate the supply chain turmoil — no matter how turbulent. By reviewing your current supply chain model to determine where your processes can be strengthened and made more efficient, as well as pinpointing your vulnerabilities, we can help you hone your supply chain’s true potential while safeguarding it against whatever comes next.  

About the authors

John Apuzzo is the leader of our International Tax Practice. He supports public and private companies, and high-net-worth individuals, as they conduct business on the global stage. His passion for developing optimal tax strategies helps his clients reinvest in their businesses and enjoy the wealth they have worked so hard to earn. 

Mandy Li is a transfer pricing partner and provides strategic and tactical transfer pricing solutions to public and private multinational organizations. She supports highly complex global engagements, with an emphasis on transactions moving to and from the China region. 

GASB Highlights Existing Mechanisms for ESG-related Disclosures

Executive Summary:

Reporting and disclosure of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-related information has long been a priority in the private sector and is now emerging as a key area of focus for state and local governments (or “government entities”).

In response to interested parties seeking more ESG-related information (e.g., investors, credit rating agencies, preparers and auditors of financial statements, citizens, policymakers, etc.) from government entities, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has released a publication to clarify how ESG-related information intersects with their existing standards.

The bottom line: GASB’s stakeholders and interested parties are seeking to understand the impacts of ESG-related matters on a government entity’s cash flows, financial position, and overall responsibility for fiscal accountability — and the publication can be seen as a form of interpretive guidance to bridge the gap.

What’s inside the publication?

GASB’s “Intersection of Environmental, Social, and Governance Matters with Governmental Accounting Standards” document was released on May 31, 2022, and it provides clear examples for government entities to make new, or enhance existing, ESG-related disclosures by leveraging their current standards and principles.

Up front, the publication acknowledges that “a single consistent definition of ESG is not prevalent in practice today.” However, broad examples are included in the publication for each pillar (note, the below list has been shortened for purposes of this article):

The interpretive portion of the publication goes on to assist government entities with detailed examples of how ESG-related information coincides with the current GASB standards (note, the below are 3 of 25 total examples from the publication):

Why this GASB release matters

In publishing this document, GASB is taking a traditional first step to introduce concepts and guidelines that set a foundation ahead for new reporting and disclosure rules in the future (also referred to as “interpretive guidance”).

This is not the first time a regulator or standard setter has issued interpretive guidance specific to ESG. In 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released their own interpretive guidance to provide clarity to the private sector on how to leverage existing financial reports to make disclosures related to climate change. While it was uncertain how many companies would incorporate climate-related information in their financial reports, many chose to do so (at last count by the SEC in 2020, 33% of the 6,644 filings submitted to the regulator contained some form of climate-related disclosure). The interpretive guidance, therefore, laid the groundwork for a new climate-related proposal issued by the SEC in March 2022.

Essentially, interpretive guidance has historically preceded the release of new, formal guidance and the creation of new standards. If this proves true in the public sector, then we will first see an increase from state and local governments enhancing their existing financial reports and disclosures by incorporating ESG-related information. Subsequently, and after further analysis by GASB of those enhanced disclosures, we will likely see the release of a new ESG-specific standard from GASB.

Increasing the pressure

As demand for ESG-related disclosures increases, pressure will also increase on governments to begin providing or enhancing the disclosures in their financial reports. Further, if your entity issues securities (e.g., municipal bonds), you may encounter pressure from credit rating agencies depending on your approach (or lack thereof) to disclose and address ESG-related risks.

At present, ESG-related disclosures are contingent on a variety of factors (including but not limited to the government entity’s location, the historical or anticipated impacts of climate change, the level of ambition to become a leader in ESG-related reporting, etc.), but at some point these disclosures will shift from voluntary to mandatory.

How MGO can help

Many state and local governments have proactively disclosed ESG-related information on their websites or in standalone ESG / sustainability reports; however, GASB’s interpretive guidance demonstrates that ESG-information also needs to be considered when preparing your annual financial reports.

To stay ahead, MGO is helping the public sector as well as the private sector, develop and enhance their ESG disclosure strategies.

If you are interested in learning more, schedule a conversation with our ESG team today.