Growth Archives - MGO CPA | Tax, Audit, and Consulting Services

Five Signs You’re Ready for Outsourced Accounting Support

Executive summary

A growing organization is a positive, but along with it usually comes increasingly complex financial accounting.
Outsourcing provides businesses of all sizes with an opportunity to manage an array of issues — from staffing shortages or a lack of specific expertise to disorganized or unsecure financial records.
Benefits of outsourcing include significant cost savings, direct access to specific accounting knowledge, the minimization of turnover, the ability to scale, access to tools and processes, and flexibility.

Many CEOs and business leaders are experiencing challenges in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, including changing customer trends, aggressive competition, emerging digital technologies, and the new normal of employee expectations for workplace flexibility.

These uncertain economic forces and cultural shifts are putting increased pressure on staffing for organizations of all sizes – especially fast-growing ones. While these difficulties are difficult to overcome, they are also an opportunity to change the “status quo” and level-up back-office performance.

For leaders navigating the uncertain tailwinds of the pandemic and planning to enter a new era of growth, outsourcing represents a powerful opportunity to address any staffing issues or business challenges. It empowers you to access specialized insight on a temporary basis, create value ahead of a major transaction, manage overhead costs, and modernize and revitalize business processes.

A recent study showed that 59% of all businesses utilize outsourced resources and that accounting is the most commonly outsourced function. So, how do you know if outsourcing your accounting function is right for your organization?

In this article we’ll look at five indicators that this strategy might be right for you and detail the key benefits to outsourcing or augmenting your accounting function.

Five signs your business may benefit from outsourced accounting

Here are some questions you should ask yourself to determine if your organization would benefit from outsourced accounting services:

Is your business growing rapidly?

If you’re experiencing a significant influx of revenue, first off, great work! Your business model is proving out and you’re on the fast-track to success. But what is happening to your expenses, profitability and working capital? Depending on your answer it could mean that your accounting needs are evolving, the risks of a breakdown are higher, and overall, there is simply more at stake. It may be time to confirm that your current in-house team is qualified and staffed appropriately to handle these new responsibilities.

Are you struggling to keep up with your accounts receivable or payroll?

One way to get a firm answer to whether your team is understaffed is if you’re missing key deadlines or struggling to get timely collection of cash from your accounts receivable. The inability to collect and follow-up on AR is essential to funding current and future growth and is directly connected to meeting your payroll commitments – one of the largest expenses of any business. If anything falls behind, you can find yourself in a difficult position if you do not have the ability to access cash or financing.

Are your financial records organized and producing usable data?

Your accounting function does more than compliance, it should help guide your organization’s financial hygiene. Organized financials tell a clear story of earnings, spending, and investment, so you can make informed decisions. An over-worked or inexperienced accounting team will be working furiously to keep up with compliance and may not have the capacity, or necessary experience, to provide guidance on your financial scorecard to accrete value to the organization.

Do your accounting needs fluctuate significantly throughout the year?

If your business experiences big shifts in labor productivity based on the calendar year and your taxes filings are late with significant overages from the tax preparers, or your audits have a significant number of adjustments, that may mean your accounting team lacks capability. Striking the right balance between hiring quality talent and the speed of bringing new hires up to date with company procedures can be a challenge. Outsourcing your team can deliver the resources you need, when you need them, and limit costs during the slower periods.

Are you concerned about financial security and checks and balances?

If your internal accounting team is one or two individuals, you may be open to hidden risks. An independent team can provide the checks-and-balances that help mitigate the risk of fraud and asset misappropriation.

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you should consider outsourcing part or all of your accounting function. With an outsourced accounting team, you gain immediate access to trained, knowledgeable staff with the knowledge you need in technical accounting. The right outsourced resources can help your business grow faster and run more smoothly — often at a lower price than building an internal accounting department.

Benefits of outsourced accounting services

1.Cost and time savings

Maintaining full-time employees can be costly — and for most organizations, labor costs are some of the highest expenses. By relying on an outsourced team, you can devote your time to growing your business and spend less time managing accounting.

Direct access to specific accounting expertise

Every company is different, which means every company’s needs are different. By outsourcing, you have access to the service you need when you need it. An outsourced team will bring familiarity with an array of accounting and reporting standards, including GAAP, IFRS, GASB, etc. Plus, they can provide specific experience with M&A transactions, raising capital, scaling, or downsizing operations.

Minimize turnover disruption

In a smaller organization, each employee is vital to the business’s success. When you lose one, the disruption left in their wake can provide additional challenges. An outsourced accounting team will never leave you in the lurch, so you can focus on what is most important: generating revenue.

The ability to scale

If your organization has grown quickly, you may experience growing pains when your fortunes suddenly shift. In boom times, you may need to hire more staff to meet demand. But that also means you may find yourself laying off employees in a downturn. Outsourcing allows you to handle more work without hiring additional employees or scale back if your capacity shrinks.

Tools and processes

No matter what your organization’s size, you should always try to keep your overhead costs minimal. By outsourcing, you can save money on specific tools or processes you might otherwise need to function. The right outsourced team will provide the know-how and equipment you need to succeed.

Flexibility

By outsourcing certain jobs, you can plan — and pivot, as needed — depending on your organization’s needs. This is especially relevant in the case of needing specialized guidance. If you’re planning a major transaction or other market move, an outsourced CFO can provide tactical expertise when and where you need it.

MGO can help

As your organization grows, your financial accounting needs become increasingly complex. Because your in-house accountants may be limited to handle the basics, outsourcing to professional teams with specialized knowledge and experience can provide precisely the kind of service you require — and give you the time you need to focus on the organization’s other needs.

MGO has a robust outsourced accounting team staffed by CPAs with diverse industry background and technical specialties. We’ll provide the right-size solution to your organization’s needs. Areas we support include day-to-day accounting tasks, complex financial systems projects, regulatory compliance demands, and support for M&A deals, raising capital, and other major transactions.

Whether you’re interested in simply augmenting your team with additional financial knowledge, or undertaking a complete accounting transformation, we can help you with the people, processes, and technology you need to move your business forward.

To explore your options and start along the path to organizational change, contact us.

Five Reasons Private Companies Should Adopt Public Controls

Often viewed as a “public company problem,” private organizations may want to consider implementing internal controls similar to Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404 requirements. The inherent benefits of a strong control environment may be of significant value to a private company by providing: enhanced accountability throughout the organization, reduced risk of fraud, improved processes and financial reporting, and more effective inclusion of the Board of Directors.

Private organizations, while not always smaller, often have limited resources in specialty areas, including accounting for income tax. This resource constraint —the work being done outside the core accounting team — combined with the complexity of the issues, means private companies are ideal candidates for, and can achieve significant benefit from, internal controls enhancements. Thinking beyond the present, the following are five reasons private companies may want to adopt public-company-level controls:

1. Future Initial Public Offering (IPO) – Walk before you run! If the company believes an IPO may be in its future, it’s better to “practice” before the company is required to be SOX compliant. A phased approach to implementation can drive important changes in company culture as it prepares to become a public organization. Recently published reports analyzing IPO activity reveal that material weaknesses reported by public companies were disproportionately attributable to recent IPO companies. Making a rapid change to SOX compliance can place a heavy burden on a newly public company.

2. Merger and Acquisition Deals – If the possibility of the company being sold to an M&A deal exists, enhanced financial reporting controls can provide the potential buyer with an added layer of security or comfort regarding the financial position of the company. Further, if the acquiring firm has an exit strategy that involves an IPO, the requirement for strong internal controls may be on the horizon.

3. Rapid Growth – Private companies that are growing rapidly, either organically or through acquisition, are susceptible to errors and fraud. The sophistication of these organizations often outpaces the skills and capacity of their support functions, including accounting, finance, and tax. Standard processes with preventive and detective controls can mitigate the risk that comes with rapid growth.

4. Assurance for Private Investors and Banks – Many users other than public shareholders may rely on financial information. The added security and accountability of having controls in place is a benefit to these users, as the enhanced credibility may impact the cost of borrowing for the organization.

5. Peer-Focused Industries – While not all industries are peer-focused, some place significant weight on the leading practices of their peers. Further, some industries require enhanced levels of security and control. For example, cannabis companies with a heavy regulatory burden, industries with sensitive customer data like lifesciences, and tech companies that handle customer data, often look to their peer group for leading practices, including their control environment. When the peer group is a mix of public and private companies, the private company can benefit from keeping pace with the leading practices of their public peers.

Private companies are not immune from the intense scrutiny of numerous stakeholders over accountability and risk. Companies with a clear understanding of the inherent risks that come from negligible accounting practices demonstrate their ability to think beyond the present, and to be better prepared for future growth or change in ownership.

Structuring Transactions to Maximize Value

Welcome to the Cannabis M&A Field Guide from MGO. In this series, our practice leaders and service providers provide guidance for navigating M&A deals in this new phase of the quickly expanding industries of cannabis, hemp, and related products and services. Reporting from the front-lines, our team members are structuring deals, implementing best practices, and magnifying synergies to protect investments and accrete value during post-deal integration. Our guidance on market realities takes into consideration sound accounting principles and financial responsibility to help operators and investors navigate the M&A process, facilitate successful transactions, and maximize value.

Deal structure can be viewed as the “Terms and Conditions” of an M&A deal. It lays out the rights and obligations of both parties, and provides a roadmap for completing the deal successfully. While deal structures are necessarily complex, they typically fall within three overall strategies, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages: Merger, Asset Acquisition and Stock Purchase.
In the following we will address these options, and common alternatives within each category, and provide guidance on their effectiveness in the cannabis and hemp markets.

Key considerations of an M&A structure

Before we get to the actual M&A structure options, it is worth addressing a couple essential factors that play a role in the value of an M&A deal for both sides. Each transaction structure has a unique relationship to these factors and may be advantageous or disadvantageous to both parties.

Transfer of Liabilities: Any company in the legally complex and highly-regulated cannabis and hemp industries bears a certain number of liabilities. When a company is acquired in a stock deal or is merged with, in most cases, the resulting entity takes on those liabilities. The one exception being asset deals, where a buyer purchases all or select assets instead of the equity of the target. In asset deals, liabilities are not required to be transferred.

Shareholder/Third-Party Consent: A layer of complexity for all transaction structures is presented by the need to get consent from related parties. Some degree of shareholder consent is a requirement for mergers and stock/share purchase agreements, and depending on the Target company, getting consent may be smooth, or so difficult it derails negotiations.

Beyond that initial line of consent, deals are likely to require “third party” consent from the Target company’s existing contract holders – which can include suppliers, landlords, employee unions, etc. This is a particularly important consideration in deals where a “change of control” occurs. When the Target company is dissolved as part of the transaction process, the Acquirer is typically required to re-negotiate or enter into new contracts with third parties. Non-tangible assets, including intellectual property, trademarks and patents, and operating licenses, present a further layer of complexity where the Acquirer is often required to have the ownership of those assets formally transferred to the new entity.

Tax Impact: The structure of a deal will ultimately determine which aspects are taxed and which are tax-free. For example, asset acquisitions and stock/share purchases have tax consequences for both the Acquirer and Target companies. However, some merger types can be structured so that at least a part of the sale proceeds can be tax-deferred.

As this can have a significant impact on the ROI of any deal, a deep dive into tax implications (and liabilities) is a must. In the following, we will address the tax implications of each structure in broad strokes, but for more detail please see our article on M&A Tax Implications (COMING SOON).

Asset acquisitions

In this structure, the Acquirer identifies specific or all assets held by the Target company, which can include equipment, real estate, leases, inventory, equipment and patents, and pays an agreed-upon value, in cash and/or stock, for those assets. The Target company may continue operation after the deal.
This is one of the most common transaction structures, as the Acquirer can identify the specific assets that match their business plan and avoid burdensome or undesirable aspects of the Target company. From the Target company’s perspective, they can offload under-performing/non-core assets or streamline operations, and either continue operating, pivot, or unwind their company.
For the cannabis industry, asset sales are often preferred as many companies are still working out their operational specifics and the exchange of assets can be mutually beneficial.

Advantages/Disadvantages

Transfer of Liabilities: One of the strongest advantages of an asset deal structure is that the process of negotiating the assets for sale will include discussion of related liabilities. In many cases, the Acquirer can avoid taking on certain liabilities, depending on the types of assets discussed. This gives the Acquirer an added line of defense for protecting itself against inherited liabilities.

Shareholder/Third-Party Consent: Asset acquisitions are unique among the M&A transaction structures in that they do not necessarily require a stockholder majority agreement to conduct the deal.

However, because the entire Target company entity is not transferred in the deal, consent of third-parties can be a major roadblock. Unfortunately, as stated in our M&A Strategy article, many cannabis markets licenses are inextricably linked to the organization/ownership group that applied for and received the license. This means that acquiring an asset, for example a cultivation facility, does not necessarily mean the license to operate the facility can be included in the deal, and would likely require re-application or negotiation with regulatory authorities.

Tax Impact: A major consideration is the potential tax implications of an asset deal. Both the Acquirer and Target company will face immediate tax consequences following the deal. The Acquirer has a slight advantage in that a “step-up” in basis typically occurs, allowing the acquirer to depreciate the assets following the deal. Whereas the Target company is liable for the corporate tax of the sale and will also pay taxes on dividends from the sale.

Stock/share purchase

In some ways, a stock/share purchase is a more efficient version of a merger. In this structure, the acquiring company simply purchases the ownership shares of the Target business. The companies do not necessarily merge and the Target company retains its name, structure, operations and business contracts. The Target business simply has a new ownership group.

Advantages/Disadvantages

Transfer of Liabilities: Since the entirety of the company comes under new ownership, all related liabilities are also transferred.

Shareholder/Third Party Consent: To complete a stock deal, the Acquirer needs shareholder approval, which is not problematic in many circumstances. But if the deal is for 100% of a company and/or the Target company has a plenitude of minority shareholders, getting shareholder approval can be difficult, and in some cases, make a deal impossible.

Because assets and contracts remain in the name of the Target company, third party consent is typically not required unless the relevant contracts contain specific prohibitions against assignment when there is a change of control.

Tax Impact: The primary concern for this deal is the unequal tax burdens for the Acquirer vs the Shareholders of the Target company. This structure is ideal for Target company shareholders because it avoids the double taxation that typically occurs with asset sales. Whereas Acquirers face several potentially unfavorable tax outcomes. Firstly, the Target company’s assets do not get adjusted to fair market value, and instead, continue with their historical tax basis. This denies the Acquirer any benefits from depreciation or amortization of the assets (although admittedly not as important in the cannabis industry due to 280E). Additionally, the Acquirer inherits any tax liabilities and uncertain tax positions from the Target company, raising the risk profile of the transaction.

Three types of mergers

1: Direct merger

In the most straight-forward option, the Acquiring company simply acquires the entirety of the target company, including all assets and liabilities. Target company shareholders are either bought out of their shares with cash, promissory notes, or given compensatory shares of the Acquiring company. The Target company is then considered dissolved upon completion of the deal.

2: Forward indirect merger

Also known as a forward triangular merger, the Acquiring company merges the Target company into a subsidiary of the Acquirer. The Target company is dissolved upon completion of the deal.

3: Reverse indirect merger

The third merger option is called the reverse triangular merger. In this deal the Acquirer uses a wholly-owned subsidiary to merge with the Target company. In this instance, the Target company is the surviving entity.

This is one of the most common merger types because not only is the Acquirer protected from certain liabilities due to the use of the subsidiary, but the Target company’s assets and contracts are preserved. In the cannabis industry, this is particularly advantageous because Acquirers can avoid a lot of red tape when entering a new market by simply taking up the licenses and business deals of the Target company.

Advantages/Disadvantages

Transfer of Liabilities: In option #1, the acquirer assumes all liabilities from the Target company. Options #2 and #3, provide some protection as the use of the subsidiary helps shield the Acquirer from certain liabilities.

Shareholder/Third Party Consent: Mergers can be performed without 100% shareholder approval. Typically, the Acquirer and Target company leadership will determine a mutually acceptable stockholder approval threshold.

Options #1 and #2, where the Target company is ultimately dissolved, will require re-negotiation of certain contracts and licenses. Whereas in option #3, as long as the Target company remains in operation, the contracts and licenses will likely remain intact, barring any “change of control” conditions.

Tax Impact: Ultimately, the tax implications of the merger options are complex and depend on whether cash or shares are used. Some mergers and reorganizations can be structured so that at least a part of the sale proceeds, in the form of acquirer’s stock, can receive tax-deferred treatment.

In conclusion

Each deal structure comes with its own tax advantages (or disadvantages), business continuity implications, and legal requirements. All of these factors must be considered and balanced during the negotiating process.

Catch up on previous articles in this series and see what’s coming next…